This site is a reflection on quantum physics and how our world is constructed — independent of mathematical models.
We present a completely new physical model that offers simple and intuitive explanations for how the world works — from tiny electrons, quarks, and atoms to galaxies and the entire universe.
Everything is based on rotation. Light, energy, and matter all arise from rotations, their sub-rotations and their resonances. Such observable objects are stable rotating entities within a dynamic medium or field (spacetime or quantum vacuum).
There is a single underlying meta-field (labelled LEDO-Field) which carries waves, resonances and stable rotating entities. All fields in standard physics and their manifestations (e.g. light/electrons/bosons) are different forms of resonances at different frequencies, with varying distance, magnitude and amplitude scales. The standard physical fields are mathematical projections of the influences of the meta-field within a considered scale. The LEDO-Field induces attractions via resonances between all types of observeable entities and their interactions in an equivalent or homologous way. The acronym LEDO stands for “Lambda Energy Density Oszillation” which is a spectral resolved gradient field.
All stable rotations are a form of energy. Thus, light and matter as we know them are different manifestations of rotating energy within a hierarchical structure.
Every rotating form of energy forms an entity, which potentially serves as another base entity for a higher level rotation. Such abstract entities are named Rotons, in their relative scale. Starting from a base soliton (self sustained rotating wave) in the Ledo-Field the universe gives itself structure from light to electrons, from quarks to atoms, from planets over solar-systems to galaxies.
Rotating energy creates waves within the base medium (aka Ledo field, spacetime or quantum vaccuum) and leads to resonances. These resonances cause attraction between rotating entities of the same kind (e.g. size, frequency, orientation, axis). As a result, rotating systems tend to align with one another, leading to attractive forces between similar rotating systems.
All stable rotating entities in space-time generate a kind of energy-density pressure within the Ledo-Field, like the sum of all waves emitted into the medium. Within a certain range, this results in repulsive effects. The repulsion is relative and directional to the energy flow at the respective Roton.
This model does not cause any singularities because there is no point-like entity anywhere in the universe. All “things” have size, a length defined by the rotation perimeter. All attractive forces within the spatial range of this rotation lengths are non existant and never reach infinity. In addition, attractive forces get smaller compared to the increasing repulsive force on smaller distances.
The stability and complexity of matter arise from the fact that attractive forces (rotation resonance) are not homogeneous in all spatial directions. This leads to energy-optimized structures, where the energy density reaches local maxima. At these positions, attractive and repulsive forces cancel each other out (statistically), creating (conditionally) stable configurations. Energy density optimizations happen based on natural fluctuations and waves in the meta-field.
Dark matter was introduced to name a yet unknown force, which modern physics still fails to find. Why? Because dark matter doesn’t exist. Modern physics expects it to be a gravitational force originating from matter. But it actually is a dark energy or rather a dark force. Modern physics has not yet realized that the rotation within a galaxy generates forces. These forces are missing in current calculations and account for a large portion of the attractive influences, which are mistakenly attributed to atomic-level phenomena like gravition. According to the Roton model the missing attractive forces are actually caused by rotations at the galactic scale.
We will demonstrate that quantum entanglement — particularly of photons and electrons — is a crucial factor in explaining why atomic nuclei hold together, and specifically why protons and electrons attract each other within atoms. To further explain phenomena such as long-distance entanglement, we introduce the concept of bitemporal causality: quanta are entangled because they always have been and ever will be entangled (within their lifespan). Both entangled twins share and remember their bi-directional future and past.
For something to be observable by humans, it must interact with something humans can detect — such as light. However, on the scale of quarks and electrons, there is very little left which can be used to observe. We do not have anything even smaller to throw around. Observation always involves interaction. On this scale, every interaction destroys the original state. Thus, we can never fully measure it — leading to the conclusion that the even smaller components no longer interact with us directly. So we will never be able to directly “observe” any substructures.
If a measurement is done on an entangled quantum, the full entanglement is destroyd. This means, that these two quanta were never — and will never be — fully entangled. Two rotating entities with the exact same size on a common rotation axis will be and remain entangled, due to increased resonances in axial direction. With this entanglement, small disturbances in orientation might even be stabilized. The entanglement breaks up if one quantum is forced out of its stable rotation axis strong enough. From this point on, entanglement will vanish, if the disturbance was too high. A disturbance on one of the entangled twins, might lead to a similar disturbance in the other twin.
How do we define time? It is fundamentally based on the rotation speed of electrons and photons (light). If, for any reason, an electron “chooses” to rotate more slowly, then time passes more slowly — and the apple decays more slowly. Time is not a universally uniform “thing”. If environmental conditions force an electron to slow its relative rotation, then time — as we perceive it — passes more slowly. There is no completely unique shared concept of time in the universe. As far as we can perceive and measure, time is a local aspect.
The wavelength/frequency of a photon can have any size you like. But an electron and atoms have an arbitrary size not related to any other natural constants. Why is that? Why does an electron have the size it has? Here is a simple explanation: An electron has its size, because all other electrons have the same size. The size allignment is given be the oscillations and resonances in the Ledo-Field. For an electron it’s simply energetically favourable to take the same size as the other electrons. This implies, that electrons at the other end of the univers do not necessarily have the exact same size as we know them. But if they happen to come closer, they would most likely adjust to the local resonances in our part of the universe.
Having said that reminds us about how to measure length. So if the basis of length is the size of e.g. a hydrogen atom, then yes, atoms have the same size in the whole universe. If the basis for length though is time (e.g. speed of light c) which is distance during a given time which again is a rotation duration of an electron in space well … I’d go with the Egg not the chicken. If you define and measure the width of an electron by the circumference of an electron (time), well then all electrons have the same size - everywhere. So physics can actually not necessarily force neither local time nor local space to be uniform, linear or comparable in the whole universe.
On basis of the Roton model, Inertia would be: resistance of a body to acceleration induced by another body, or simply the sum of all rotational attributes and attractions between the two objects. This might imply though, that a body has no universal inertia, but an inertia that depends on the source object. Acceleration depends on the sub-structure of both objects. So the “weight” of the atoms listed in the periodic system depends on the atomic composition of the earth. So in the optimal case, you as a reader already have a few experiments in mind to disprove this concept - maybe measure atoms on the moon.
With all these teasers, you are invited to dive into the details presented on this website as the “Roton Quantum Model” to see how easily this model explains complex behavior — even in areas where modern standard physics has yet to provide answers.
Yours, Olav le Doigt