A new theory on energy dispersion, stable resonances and self-organization.
Join creating physics intuitively from a photon quantum entanglement up to the universes filaments.
This site is a proposal and reflection on quantum physics and how our world is constructed — independent of mathematical models.
We present a completely new physical model that offers simple and intuitive explanations for how the world works — from tiny electrons, quarks, and atoms to galaxies and the entire universe.
Article: Critical Assessment of the Rotonal Quantum Model - read↗
How does qauntum entanglement create our world? What happens when energy rotates around its own past and future?
What will we discover: Quantum entanglement is not what we have to create, it is the fundament on how electrons, nuclei and atoms work.
Everything is based on rotation. Light, energy, and matter all arise from rotations, their sub-rotations and their resonances. Such observable objects are stable rotating and resonating entities within a dynamic field (spacetime/quantum vacuum).
There is an underlying meta-field (labelled LEDO-Field) which carries resonances and stable rotating entities. All manifestations of this field in our world (e.g. light/electrons/bosons) are different forms of stable resonances at different frequencies and directions, with varying distances, magnitude and amplitude scales. The standard physical fields are mathematical projections of the manifestations of the meta-field within a considered scale. The LEDO-Field induces attractions via resonances between all types of observable (self-resonant) entities, their interactions in an equivalent or homologous way. The acronym LEDO stands for “Lambda Energy Density Oscillation” which is a spectrally and directionally resolved field. Rotating entities create a directed resonance potential at which span (size, freuqency) the can couple into the universal resonance-field. This will be described as inertia.
All stable rotations are a form of energy. Thus, light and matter as we know them are different manifestations of rotating energy within a hierarchical structure.
Every rotating form of energy forms an entity, which potentially serves as another base entity for a higher level rotation. Such abstract entities are named Rotons, in their relative scale. Starting from a base Soliton (self sustained rotating oszillation/wave) in the LEDO-Field, the universe gives itself structure from light to electrons, from quarks to atoms, from planets over solar-systems to galaxies and the whole Filament-Clusters of the Universe.
Rotons are introduced as a circular and planar rotation of energy. This rotation is self-sustained and stable. External influences might add wobbling and precession. In general Rotons might basically have any form of 3D trajectory, provided it is stable, closed and continuously differentiable. Rotons might induce resonances that lead energy into externally induce paths. We’ll call such not self sustained entities a Resonon. They exist because other Resonons or Rotons keep (in-weave) them in stable place. This will get important for in-weavment of valence-electrons.
Rotating energy creates instant waves (resonance potentials) within the base medium (LEDO field, aka spacetime or quantum vacuum) and leads to resonances. These resonances cause attraction between rotating entities of the same kind (e.g. size, frequency, orientation). As a result, rotating systems tend to align with one another, leading to attractive forces between similar rotating systems. Think of two entangular attracting Rotons like a bolt and nut that draw each other in. If two Rotons are exactly aligned (entangled) they feel a constant strong force over any distance. If randomly rotating they distribute their resonance-potentials in all spatial directions ($1/r^2$). More specifically resonance potentials induce a rotational moment to a Roton in form of integration of all potentials in all directions (Tensor-Field).
All stable rotating entities in space-time generate a kind of energy-density pressure within the LEDO-Field, like the sum of all waves (resonances) emitted into the field. Within a certain range, this results in repulsive effects. The repulsion is relative and directional to the energy flow at the respective Roton. Key realization: Energy density pressure (e.g. within a proton) could be simply seen/modeled as the absence of attractions from the outside. The outside “draws” at the (nearly) empty Proton trying to tear it apart. The protons structure withholds and keeps the nucleus together. This shielding of rotonal resonances is possible, within the space of perfectly entangled Rotons.
This model does not cause any singularities because there is no point-like entity anywhere in the universe. All “things” have size, a length defined by the rotation perimeter. All attractive forces within the spatial range of this rotation lengths are linear or non existent and never reach infinity. In addition, attractive forces get smaller compared to the increasing repulsive force on smaller distances. Simulations read↗ show as a prove of concept a very stable system behavior.
The stability and complexity of matter arise from the fact that attractive forces (rotation resonance) are not homogeneous in all spatial directions. This leads to energy-optimized structures, where the energy density reaches local maxima. At these positions, attractive and repulsive forces cancel each other out (statistically), creating (conditionally) stable configurations. Energy density optimizations happen based on natural fluctuations and waves (energy density changes) in the meta-field.
Rotational resonances exhibit distinct axial and spatial dependencies. (1) The dominant coupling is the co-axial resonance, representing a distance-independent (entangled) alignment effect that arises when rotational axes coincide. (2) For some resonances (e.g electrons), parallel-axial resonances emerge between rotations whose axes remain aligned but spatially separated, producing distance-keeping forces (phase locking) that scale approximately as $1/d$. This results in favored resonating distances and frequencies. (3) With randomly changing orientations (no axial alignments), isotropic resonance follows, contributing an attractive component in all spatial directions with a characteristic decay of $1/d^2$. (4) Finally, this hierarchy is balanced by a repulsive term associated with the gradient of the local energy density, decaying as $1/d^3$. These relations hold for Rotons of comparable intrinsic parameters such as size, frequency, or rotational phase.
Axial resonances and resulting forces between Rotons act instantaneously across the entire universe, with no distance-dependent attenuation — similar in spirit to quantum entanglement. But the speed of changes in local manifestations (moving stable resonances) is limited. Limitations arise in the response of Rotons to these forces and angular tolerances. Stable LEDO-objects possess rotonal inertia, originating from their rotational energy and from the recoil associated with changes of rotational axes (tilt, precession). As a consequence, the propagation of energy-density oscillations (energy-pressure changes) is not instantaneous but limited by this inertial response. The effective reaction speed is further constrained or rather driven by the level of respective background fluctuations. Stable rotating entities shift their position only probabilistically, as they continuously seek configurations of higher energy-density optimization. While the LEDO field wobbles due to background fluctuations — an oscillatory field integral not tied to spatial distance—objects gradually settle into rotation axes and locations that represent more energetically favorable states.
A Photon is the most basic form of a Roton with a single oscillation direction. Why does it travel at the speed of light? In the first place because it can, provided it keeps its rotation axis unchanged (no imposed inertia). Second, because it tries to escape from its own energy density until it reaches the speed of light. So where does its speed limit arise from? Because the universe does not allow it. As a Roton it still feels the resonance potentials from other Photons along its rotation axis. This minimal fluctuation mostly integrates to zero (in our part of the universe) but it still needs time such that the imposed small precession can be taken care of imposed by the Inertial Gyroscopic Tensor (IGT) field. Or in other words the pure photon is a 1 dimensional oscillation which could travel with no time dilatation. But it is slightly forced into a 2 dimensional oscillation (precession) giving it a very small rotation dynamic inertia. Postulate: A Photon is a basic Roton with a single 1 dimensional oscillation. Take away: A photon can travel on non-linear trajectories with no speed loss provided the rotation axis remains unchanged.
If multiple Rotons come closer and succeed to overcome their energy density pressure they build other stable compounds. In this way photons cluster to packets or start to enter 3D. Intuitively an electron might be a compound of 3 photons rotating in 3 different spatial directions (see Resonon). Even a single Photon might be bent into 3D world creating a stable self-resonant closed loop. Maybe it is also a combination of 3 Loops of electrons. Postulate: An electron is a (elementary) particle built from photons oscillating in 3 dimensional trajectories around a common center. It can build entanglements into 3 spatial directions.
Driven by the current energy density gradients and background fluctuations in the LEDO-Field the world constantly and inevitably “tries” to find optimal distributions of energy. Rotational electron-compounds start to create stable structures resisting the worlds tendency to entropy. Electrons build rotational pairs (e.g. as observed in atoms) that attract each other. Differently layered rotational electron-compounds start to create stable structures resisting the worlds tendency to entropy. Spoiler: Electrons build up nuclei with the purpose to simply hold electrons at their place which attracts entangled electrons into its orbitals.
There are different “Tiers” of Rotonal objects in the world. Depending on how many dimensions their resonance coupling enters.
Time: Time is the resistance of the universe to instant reorientation of a rotonal alignment. Photons experience no time as they could reorient themselves instantly when interacting with matter. The more contained rotonal energy a system has (rotonal inertia) the slower local time gets though (at least from the formulas). Example: Big masses, black holes.
Dark matter was introduced to name a yet unknown force, which modern physics still fails to find. Why? Because dark matter doesn’t exist. Modern physics expects it to be a gravitational force originating from matter. But it actually is a dark energy or rather a dark force. Modern physics has not yet realized that the rotation within a galaxy generates forces. These forces are missing in current calculations and account for a large portion of the attractive influences, which are mistakenly attributed to atomic-level phenomena like gravitation. According to the Roton model the missing attractive forces are actually caused by rotations at the galactic scale.
We show an alternative Olavian Atom Model. It’s intuitive character is based on attractions of resonating Rotons. Depending on the environment, atoms take different structures and varying energy optima. The Olavian Atom orbitals are closed trajectories taking up the combined resonances of multiple base rotations. The p-orbitals or resonant couplings to s-orbitals of different sizes, e.g. p2 couples to the s1 and s2 shells.
Atoms are an optimization of rotational energies to iteratively reach more energetically optimal rotations in respect to the Roton Model. The most attractive constellations are co-axially entangled (electron-proton-proton-electron) Roton coupling combinations. Furthermore electrons find their places in resonant distances from the center. Further optimizations allow electrons to lock into resonances with multiple other electrons with different rotation radii (a Resonon). An electrons planar Rotonal rotation can start to precess (tilt) to couple with electrons of different shells.
Finding: The standard physics term “excitation” (e.g. of a quark or electron) often translates well to temporal “precession” within the sub-roton states.
Why do bonds between atoms lead to stable molecules? Let’s understand the most attractive binding type and reveal that it is based on electron entanglement and electron trajectory resonances. Even electrons of different atoms can create “Entangled” pairs, while still keeping their entanglement to “their” own protons alive. This again leads to the most attractive bond between two electrons and two protons of different atoms. The radius of valence shells in a molecule are driven by this bonding - and are roughly equal between different elementary atoms.
The electron, one of the most fundamental particles in nature, remains among the least understood. We try to build an electron based on photons traveling on self-resonant loops. The master class, want to try yourself before jumping into the authors visionary proposal? Insight: Electrons build entangled chains keeping their distance and speed in a common direction. For instance when passing along an atom lattice. The protons of the atoms are not expected to disturb them, as the free electrons do not have individual rotonal entanglements to the atom cores.
We will show how protons can be structured with Rotons such that we can describe the observed Electron-Proton attraction. Insights: Protons and electrons are only ‘cages’ that keep (anti-) electrons stable in space and orientation. Such a cage shell is called Proton when it contains a Inverse-Rotating Electron.
The Nucleus of a Atom consisting of Protons and Neutrons (as they say) has this task: Provide maximal attraction for the resonant electron trajectories. So the proton or more precisely the co-electron in the nucleus needs special geometrical freedom to provide the rotating electron with the constant possibility to share their axis. The Nucleus interestingly shows nearly symmetric Compound-Objects of a protons and electrons. A structure that confines the protons “charge” (co-axially anti-parallel to electron). This allows the entangled electrons location to rotate freely and remain entangled. completely independent of the other protons and neutrons on the nucleon.
We well see interesting predictions regarding the ratio of protons and electrons in different atoms and isotopes.
The atom core has to allow a full symmetric rotation of two orbital electrons also allowing co-axial rotation of Electron pairs. This needs a linear Electron-Proton-Proton-Electron coupling. Each electron couples individually to its own proton. So the linear Proton-Proton object needs to be able to freely rotate in all spatial directions. A symmetric compound is needed to fulfills this task.
Why shall huge proton have the exact same charge as a point-like electron? Well, now you know: it does not. Protons, Nucleons and Alpha-Particles are only heavy containers which keep electrons/positrons in place so they can entangle with the free rotating electrons.
We proudly present an illustration of an Olavian version of the Alpha-Particle. We choose a symmetric constellation of 4 Nuclei with 4 Sonons (3 Quarks) and 2 Pole-Caps conveying the charge itself. The so called Alpha Particle is a special combination of 2 electrons/positrons confined in a cache built of 4 Protons/Neutrons or 12 quarks (equal to 18 Inter-Resonant Sonsons). This $\alpha$ particle is the basic building block of the atom nucleus.
The alpha-particle keeps the electrons in line and holds them together so they can keep their stable distance and resonances. This allows to attract free electrons even better. The question also arises, why atoms seem to be built from Alpha-Particles - 2 Alpha-Particles use more space then 4 D-Cores. Answer: Because an $\Alpha$ can rotate freeliy, and 2 rotating D-Cores use more space.
This chapter is to prove, that the Olavian Atom model can predict or at least explain the stable and unstable isotopes.
We will demonstrate that quantum entanglement — particularly of photons and electrons — is a crucial factor in explaining why atomic nuclei hold together, and specifically why protons and electrons attract each other within atoms. To further explain phenomena such as long-distance entanglement, we introduce the concept of bitemporal causality read↗: quanta are entangled because they always have been and ever will be entangled (within their lifespan). Both entangled twins share and remember their bi-directional future and past.
For something to be observable by humans, it must interact with something humans can detect — such as light. This holds at least in the scales at which light can interact with Rotons the span of our atoms. However, on the scale of quarks and electrons, there is very little left which can be used to observe. We do not have anything even smaller to throw around. Observation always involves interaction. On this scale, every interaction destroys some of the original state. Thus, we can never measure the full state but only a statistical effect over many different measurements. This might lead to the conclusion that the even smaller components no longer interact with us directly. So we will never be able to directly “observe” any substructures. Still we can hope for the ability to trigger lower-level rotons to react via rotonal resistance by manipulating and observing minimal state changes of higher level rotons.
If a measurement is done on an entangled or hierarchical quantum, the full entanglement is destroyed. This might also mean, that these two quanta were never — and will never be — fully entangled. Two rotating entities with the exact same mode on a common rotation axis will be and remain entangled, due to increased resonances in axial direction. With this entanglement, small disturbances in orientation might even be stabilized. The entanglement breaks up if one quantum is forced out of its stable rotation axis strong enough. From this point on, entanglement will vanish, if the disturbance was too high. A disturbance on one of the entangled twins, might lead to a similar disturbance in the other twin.
How do we define time? It is fundamentally based on the rotation speed of electrons and photons (light). If, for any reason, an electron “chooses” to rotate more slowly, then the electrons time for a virtual global observer passes more slowly — and the apple decays more slowly. Would we “perceive” this slow-down? Time is not a universally uniform “thing”. If environmental conditions force an electron to slow its relative rotation, then time — as we perceive it — passes more slowly. There is no completely unique shared concept of time in the universe. As far as we can perceive and measure, time is a local aspect.
The wavelength/frequency of a photon can have any size you like. But an electron and atoms have an arbitrary size not related to any other natural constants. Why is that? Why does an electron have the size it has? Here is a simple explanation: An electron has its size, because all other electrons have the same size. The size alignment is given be the oscillations and resonances in the LEDO-Field of the universe. For an electron it’s simply energetically favorable to take the same size as the other electrons. This implies theoretically, that electrons at the other end of the universe do not necessarily have the exact same size as we know them. But as soon as resonances spread out and overlap, they would most likely adjust to a common resonance in our observable part of the universe.
Having said that reminds us about how to measure length. So if the basis of length is the size of e.g. a hydrogen atom, then yes, atoms have the same size in the whole universe. If the basis for length though is time (e.g. speed of light c) which is distance during a given time which again is a rotation duration of an electron in space well … I’d go with the egg not the chicken. If you define and measure the width of an electron by the circumference of an electron (time), well then all electrons have the same size - everywhere. So physics can actually not necessarily force neither local time nor local space to be uniform, linear or comparable in the whole universe.
Rotating entities create a directed resonance potential at which span (size, freuqency) they can couple into the universal resonance-field. This will be described as inertia.
On basis of the Roton model, Inertia would be: resistance of a body to acceleration induced by another body. Or more precisely the resistance to change of rotation axis induced by LEDO-field resonances. Overall it is simply the sum of all energy placement, rotational attributes, attractions and temporal changes thereof between the two objects. And this all in a dynamic self-looped context. This might imply though, that a body has no universal inertia, but an inertia that depends on the source object. Acceleration depends on the sub-structure and sub-behavior of both objects. So the “weight” of the atoms listed in the periodic system might depend on the atomic composition of (e.g.) the earth. So in the optimal case, you as a reader already have a few experiments in mind to disprove this concept - maybe measure atoms on the moon?
Think of a Roton as a spring along its diametrical span. If a force starts to drag on one Sub-Particle, this will lead to some tension in the spring in either direction. Leading to squeezing, wobbling and precession of the rotonal path. This tension remains as long as the force applies. So any change of direction or force leads to a counter-force between the Twin and Twon roton. A force on the level of an atom span (gravity) will initially only influence the atom-span roton. But if that force changes, the Sub-Rotons need to adjust too. So they react on the first-derivative of the applied force (force change). This can be propagated downwards to the even smaller Sub-Rotons. In addition, this is also propagated upwards to the environment in the form of further resonances or temperature effects. The higher level environment reacts on it as an integral over the sub-states (e.g. as in a microwave oven).
Galaxies when modeled as Rotons build stable flowing and pulsing structures. These are also known as filaments.
Why does an atom have the size it has today? And why do atoms take stable orbitals at the distance the have today? This is caused by a background fluctuation which have some maximum resonances in the spatial size of atoms. This LEDO-Field fluctuation on atom level can actually be confirmed indirectly via a measurable uniform radiation, originating from objects from an earlier time in the universe. Evidence comes from the existence of a cosmic microwave background (CMB) read↗ matching to the radiation emitted by objects the size magnitude of an atom.
Big masses lead photons into curved paths. Instead of bending space and time to explain this effect, the Roton-Model explains this quite naturally with attractive directional resonances. Nevertheless you can imagine the infinity of the universe being like the singularity of a black hole, inverted and point-mirrored. The closer you get the slower you become the slower an atom turns and the slower time passes. You will never reach the center or in this case infinity. The absence of fluctuations at this rotonal scale prevents any further motion. The universe is the final Roton caught in self-resonance, from where nothing will ever escape.
With all these teasers, you are invited to dive into the details presented on this website as the “Roton Quantum Model” to see how easily this model explains complex behavior — even in areas where modern standard physics has yet to provide answers.
Yours, Olav le Doigt