Mapping of standard physics to the Olavian rotonal model

Why is this chapter necessary?

Originally the Roton-Model was no intended to make use of any standard concepts. Instead it lives from hierarchical structure self-sustained resonances. The world is built up from scratch. This approach does not define, whether a certain level of rotational construct corresponds to e.g. a real photon, electron or neutron.

To make it clearer to the general reader what this theory is about and to understands its implications it seems we need to define a certain mapping to standard physics terms and how they might best be interpreted.

Elementary particles

Spacetime

A resonance field resolved by frequency and direction at any of its spatial and temporal location.

Entities, Particles and quantum objects

Any sort of temporally stable rotation or oscillation within the resonance field. The stability of an oscillation can be self-sustained or imposed-sustained.

Photon

A Photon is a basic inherent oscillation, modeled as a single one-dimensional rotation around one axis. A virtual point rotating around its own past and future location. The effective rotation-speed of a photon is indifferent and hypothetically infinite in respect to matter. But the rotation is modeled via a specific peak-radius which defines its energy. A photon is not held at a specific location in space. Lacking inertia when traveling uninfluenced (in one direction) a photon avoids it’s own oscillation waves (energy density) and thereby “instantly” accelerates to its maximal speed.

Particles

Particles and matter are a hierarchical structure of stable rotating or oscillating compounds of smaller lower level particles or rather energy.

Particle size

Characterization of a resonant coherence length over which its self-sustaining field amplitude remains significant.

Electron

A multidimensional object combining oscillations in at least 3 dimensions. It is modeled as 3 separate rotations in 3 directions held together by the fact, that they are closer together than their rotational span. On this level the keep themselves confined within their ration radius. In the model, an electron consists of 3 Rotons at the “same” place (smaller than their effective spatial extent). An electron intrinsically remains at its relative place, as it has anchors into all 3 dimensions. Acceleration induces change of rotational axes (spin) resulting in inertia.

Electron size

Why do electrons not have any size in standard physics? This is because they always “behave” as point-like particles. They do this in respect of how they react on their surrounding. A double rotational system in perfect entangled state will not expose any resonance (entanglement) potentials to the outside anymore. At least not in respect to the span of their constituents. The system reacts as a point-like particle from the middle of its entanglement axis. The whole (far field) energy density is at a point-like position. Two (not entangled) electrons could basically just pass through each other (at least nearly) if they have enough kinetic energy. Electrons consist of rotating photons. As such the photons always rotate at their constant fastest possible speed at their respective radius. So any radius will be a stable radius with no preference. This way the rotation of an electron has the same energy, independent of its actual radius. From the outside viewer, the rotation radius does not matter. And as light passes through light (nearly) undisturbed, no one would ever realize how big the rotation radius of an electron actually is. And once it would matter, the electron might simply squeeze into it’s new needed size. Photons would just avoid each other on their rotational path, simply unnoticed.

Particle size again

Unlike electrons: Why do higher-level particles have a relevant size or length? Because electrons themselves can NOT travel at the speed of light anymore. Different stable orbitals mean different energy. Electrons are bound to at least 3 spatial axis and their rotational inertia.

Positron

A positron is an electron entangled with another electron. So basically an electron which rotates into the opposite direction. So why are there nearly no positrons in the universe? Because they change into electrons. They are only observed as positrons as long as they are entangled or have not changed their rotation axis yet - within the induced field needed for the measurements.

Energy

Energy

A measure of an entity’s intrinsic self-stabilization that maintains the entity above the level of stochastic background fluctuations (quantum foam, vacuum noise). Higher level entities are a combination of rotating energy. Rotations induce waves into an oscillation potential field. This results in some energy density pressure on the respective frequency and spatial scale.

Conservation of energy

Well to be honest, this does not exist as such. Every entity is built of some sub-entities and their rotonal forces. Lowest energy entities might eventually even spread out into background waves which are not directly measurable. In the end, humans assign energy to different entities they observe in such a way that the overall “energy” remains correct in their calculations. Which is a good thing for calculations, but does not tell anything about the energy which is contained within the sub-structures of an entity. This energy remains hidden until relevant.

Electric charge

Negative electric charge simply corresponds to entanglement potentials and energy density at the rotonal span of electrons.

Positive charge

Positive charge does not exist as originally proposed by standard physics. Positive charge is simply “the absence of negative charge” at locations where negative charge is favorable to be. Or in other words a free electron has so defined “negative charge”.

Electric current

Electric current has nothing to do with negative or positive charges. Electric current refers to a set of moving chains of distance entangled electrons and their natural repulsion via energy density. Electrons move from “places” with many electrons to “places” with less electrons. Within matter: Metallic grids allow electrons to build moving chains. Ionized atoms provide free orbital places for electrons (e.g. within batteries). Via this process the resonance distance entangled chain of electrons is “sucked” towards the ionized atoms.

Electric field

Free electrons align and build virtual chains in the sense, that they align with the surrounding averaged electron-entanglement potentials. So the electrical field is a purely locally averaged phenomenon.

Magnetism and magnetic potential

A permanent magnet can be regarded as a magnetic potential. A perma-magnet is not magnetic because it contains more or less charge - but because it consists of matter which exposes resonance potentials in the span of electrons into some common (not random) direction. Why are some materials said to be metallic and can be magnetizes? Within metals, molecules are aligned in some grids. This happens because the atoms in the molecules align according to their bonding capabilities. Which all comes back to the structure of the atom-nucleus which expose some resonances into specific spatial directions. Favored atom directions can only arise, if the nuclei within an atom core align according to these spatial directions. This happens, when e.g. alpha-particles create a certain spatial structure which … aligned atoms lead to aligned electrons. Aligned rotating electrons lead to rotonal attractions or repulsion (indirectly).

Magnetic field

A magnetic field corresponds to the inertia effect of the resonance potential field. The resonance potential field induces torque to Rotons of the same span. A magnetic field depicts changes in orientation of rotonal axes of electrons. Such changes lead the electron to avoid the opposed torque by acceleration and movement. Summarized a magnetic field might induce change of position, speed and rotonal orientation of an electron. Such a change induces torques and movement to other electrons. A magnetic potential and a magnetic field are completely different sources of forces leading to movement or re-orientation of the electrons rotonal axes (plural is intentional).

Electrical force

Force given by electron entanglement.

Magnetic force

Force given by …

Entanglement and Forces

Quantum entanglement

Objects with an exact co-axial alignment induce a constant amount of attraction. This attraction is indifferent from their distance and only depends on their rotation-radius (resonant coherence length) and frequency. Or more precisely their interaction plane.

Entangled Forces

Every roton or resonant entity induces resonance potentials into the resonant field in axial direction. These can lead to constant attraction (anti-parallel axial alignment) or resonance distance lock-in (parallel axial alignment).

Averaged Forces

A directional resonance potential might spread in an observed arbitrary direction. Integrated over multiple entities this “directional attraction” fades out into a 1/r^2 spherical distribution.

Gravity

A randomly 1/r^2 spherically spread distribution of resonance potentials into space. Gravity in terms of standard physics is limited to forces which are spread out from objects in the size (coherence length) of electrons and atoms. Electrons for instance can not directly couple to resonance potentials sent out by atoms (orbital span). But to the electrons within an atom. So atoms can still “feel” the gravity of electrons, because they consist of electrons and the electrons in the atom “couple” to outside electrons.

Dark matter

Dark matter is not matter in the general sense. We should rather call it “dark attraction”. These forces appear from rotational objects the size of solar systems and galaxies. Earth for instance can not couple to resonance fields of rotating galaxies as earth is much too small. But solar systems and galaxies couple to each others resonance waves. This leads to attractions which are not covered by standard physics.

Nuclear forces

The Roton-Model starts from resonant subsystems, not forces/interactions. Everything that looks like a “force” is a secondary effect of resonance geometry. The key discriminator is: Does a process preserve the internal resonance topology, or does it change it?

Strong nuclear force

Resonance-preserving coupling. Acts between closed or nearly closed rotonal units. A virtual force which keeps separate stable resonance networks together. Couples external resonance fields, not internal identities. Does not change: roton type, internal resonance count, closure class of the object. This force only redistributes: phase, orientation, spatial overlap. This for instance produces stable cluster structures (e.g. alpha clustering). The “strong” interaction is actually the more “tolerant” one. So fluctuations in positions of Alpha-Particles do not lead to any persistent changes. The system eventually just returns to its previous stable grid state.

Weak nuclear force

Resonance-topology-changing transition. Acts inside a rotonal unit. A virtual force resisting a re-wiring of the resonance network. Exceeding its limits might change: resonance count, resonance handedness, internal closure structure. Temporarily opens a previously closed resonance channel. Requires a high internal mismatch to proceed. This for instance enables identity change between neutron and proton. The “weak” force or interaction is the “less tolerant” one. So variations in the positions of the quons/resons within a nucleon might potentially lead to topology changes. This even though it acts on a lower rotonal span.

Matter and structure

Nucleus

A nucleus like a proton or neutron consist of a grid of electron-like entities, which keep themselves in resonant distances (parallel axial alignment). Additional rotations of these “electron-like entities” lead to even denser attraction and more optimal energetic placement of entities. Like this: where-ever attractive forces arise, the places they attract to are going to be taken eventually. The nuclei build geometric grids in space in the form of tetrahedron, dodecahedron and icosahedron. Why is this? They need to resist forces that try to tear them apart. Such structures are known to be the most stable symmetrical grid-structures.

Proton

A Proton is a filled cage for an electron. An electron confined by the repulsive energy density field of the nucleus grid. When an electron is held up in space (in a nucleus) it leads to attraction. Attraction is induced via entanglement (electron orbitals) or spread out as resonance potentials (electric field). This is why a proton acts like a positron. It contains an electron (entity in the rotonal span of an electron), otherwise it could not couple to an external electron. So think of the proton as giving magnetic inertia to an electron which exactly induces an inertial field onto other electron.

Neutron

A Neutron is an empty cage with no central electron. It basically builds bigger more stable cages together with protons.

He-Core

A geometrically stable spherical grid containing an electron. The electron is kept at its place.

Quarks

Well, they do not exist as such. A quark is only a combination of resonance grid-points and a structure of energy that might pop up in pairs (a pion) when you shoot a nucleus apart ;-)

Gluons

Well, they do not exist as such. A gluon is a “term” for an entanglement connection between the nucleon grid-points. So a gluon is basically the energy kept within a resonance distance Lock-In and its geometric aspect.

Quon

We need to introduce this term as an electron-like particle which is able to create (at least) 3 resonant distance locking entanglements. Therefore consisting of three Sub-Rotons confined within the same resonance potential pot.

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) ↔ Rotonal Quon Model (RQM)

Nucleus stability

In QCD, stability emerges from symmetry saturation. In the Rotonal Model, stability emerges from resonance optimization.

Both descriptions encode the same structural idea using different languages:

• QCD speaks in terms of spin, isospin, shells, and statistics;
• the Rotonal Model speaks in terms of resonance potentials, resonance channels, entanglement, Reson coupling, distance-locking and closure

Closed quantum system

QCD meaning: A quantum system is considered closed when all internal degrees of freedom are saturated: spins are fully paired, isospin is balanced, no lower-energy decay channels are available, and the system resides in a local or global energy minimum. A textbook example is the alpha particle (⁴He), which has spin 0, isospin 0, and a fully filled lowest nuclear shell.

Rotonal analogue: A closed system corresponds to a configuration with no open resonance channels. All available resonance potentials are occupied, phase relations are saturated, and no further energy redistribution through resonance coupling is possible. The system is dynamically quiet and highly stable. A fully closed system is reached in combination with the orbital electrons.

Bosonic composite

QCD meaning: A composite object is bosonic if its total spin is an integer. Even if built from fermions, the full system obeys Bose statistics and can occupy the same quantum state as other identical composites (e.g. alpha particles). Rotonal analogue: A bosonic whole arises when all resonance potentials are exhausted through complete pairing (parallel or antiparallel). The object behaves as a single coherent resonance unit, can be spatially localized, and multiple such units may coexist without mutual exclusion.

Paired spin

QCD meaning: Two spin-$1/2$ particles may combine into a spin-0 (singlet) state (antiparallel, paired), or a spin-1 (triplet) state (parallel, unpaired). Spin pairing lowers the total energy and is a major driver of nuclear stability. Rotonal analogue: Spin pairing corresponds to maximal entanglement between two resonant subsystems. A paired configuration indicates that the available resonance potential between the constituents is fully utilized, leaving no residual coupling capacity.

Nuclear shell states

QCD / nuclear physics meaning: Nucleons occupy discrete energy levels (shells) in an effective nuclear potential, analogous to electron shells in atoms. Closed shells correspond to particularly stable nuclei. The alpha particle fills the lowest shell completely.

Rotonal analogue: Shell states correspond to discrete resonance distances or resonance modes. An alpha particle occupies the lowest allowed resonance separations of its internal resonators, forming an optimally saturated and symmetric resonance structure. This results in a maximaly stable Reson grid-structure.

Fermionic particle

QCD meaning: A fermion has half-integer spin and obeys the Pauli exclusion principle: no two identical fermions may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. Examples include electrons, protons, neutrons, and the triton. Rotonal analogue: Fermionic behavior reflects the fact that the object cannot share an identical resonance configuration with another identical object. In particular, it cannot fully couple to an already occupied orbital resonance (e.g. an electron pair), leaving at least one resonance channel open. Considerations: What happens with a Proton-Proton coupled pair? Both open electron-level resonance-potentials can not couple, as they or both locked in location (no stable coupled rotational state). The static attractive force between two protons induced by a center-electron coupling is too low to be relevant.

Isospin Rotation

QCD meaning: Isospin is an internal SU(2) symmetry of the strong interaction that treats protons and neutrons as two states of the same particle. Rotations in isospin space leave the strong force invariant. Rotonal analogue: Isospin rotation corresponds to the ability of a particle to rotate internally in place while remaining resonantly coupled to its environment, at least in one directional plane. This allows the nucleus (e.g. a proton or deuteron) to dynamically align with the entanglement structure imposed by an orbital electron and to couple efficiently to its resonance potential.

Color confinement

QCD meaning: Quarks cannot exist as free particles; they are permanently confined within color-neutral (color-singlet) states such as baryons and mesons. Rotonal analogue: Elementary resonators cannot exist in isolation. Stable entities must form resonance-neutral composites, where all directional resonance gradients cancel externally.

Color singlet

QCD meaning: Only color-neutral combinations (singlets) are physically observable. All hadrons are color singlets. Rotonal analogue: A physically observable object must be resonance-balanced, emitting no net directional resonance flux to the outside. This holds within the relevant span. This means, that a proton is a singlet within barion rotonal span, but can still expose a resonance potential on the electron span.

Residual strong force

QCD meaning: The nuclear force between nucleons is a residual effect of QCD, often modeled via meson (pion) exchange. Rotonal analogue: Residual forces arise from overlapping or leaking resonance fields between otherwise closed resonance structures. Especially in case of distance-locked resonances (parallel), the resonance potential will span over multiple nucleons.

Ground state

QCD meaning: The lowest-energy configuration of a quantum system, with no accessible lower state. Rotonal analogue: The minimum-resonance configuration, where all accessible resonance modes are phase-locked and no further relaxation is possible. The most dense structure which a system can potentially find. The system is optimized for energy density and no closer distance-locked resonance potential or entanglement attraction orbital is available.

Cosmic structures

Black hole/neutron stars

An object where the rotating constituents of e.g. electrons or quons can not avoid each others locations anymore. So electron-like particles (quons) might be pressed together into each others resonant coherence lengths. In this way quons might build multidimensional (>3) structures, encapsulating more connection energy than standard 3D-matter. The term “Neutron-star” is somewhat misleading here. If atoms come closer together than their solid-state crystal structure, orbital electrons cease to be such and will get embedded into the nucleus structure. Basically forming neutron like quon-meshes. But still they can be pressed further together until quons overcome their coherence length and will combine into multidimensional (or at least multi-mesh) like structures. They confine much more energy than standard matter. But they might eventually cease to remain gravitationally attractive (no more atom sized potentials). And be reduced to electron sized long distance attractive potentials.

3 dimensions

Will Multi-dimensional matter as in neutron stars remain multi-dimensional when pressure gets lower? Observations (there is none) tell us that this might not be the case. So matter as we know it seems to have remained 3 dimensional, because this is the most stable self-sustained form. This suggests, that any higher dimensional geometric grids might not improve stability.