Antimatter

Think of antimatter as entities, that rotation into the opposite direction as matter. So they will not produce a positive attractive gravitational force but a repulsive one. This can be compared to the

Helicity

Handedness of a rotation in relation to motion. This is called helicity. Helicity:

• Left-handed: “spin points opposite the direction of motion”
• Right-handed: “spin points along the direction of motion”

Anti-?

What should exist: A anti-deuterium nucleus containing an e- or e+ confined in a anti-proton and anti-neutron (or two anti-neutron).

What gravity does Anti-Matter have? Creating a Anti-Deuterium shows, that a positron rotates around a nucleus-confined electron. But gravity depends on the rotation direction of the positron around the nucleus - and this will not be an Anti-Deuterium. So the Anti-Deuterium will still have it’s positron rotate clockwise? Induced or rather encouraged by the cosmic microwave-background oscillation?

Does it matter for a di-roton (double rotating energy) what sub-particle is rotating and which sub-mode it has? Probably not.

And if it does, the Positron will most likely simply rotate in the other direction and still hang into the happy cosmic background oscillation.

Backholes

Think of a black hole not as a big attractive mass. Think of it as a big rotating system which has so many rotational energy, that it pulls itself into the center more and more. A huge amount of Rotons in big resonance. The smaller the radius the denser all types of energy/matter gets. First atoms will push together, to keep the energy density high, Anti-Matter or rather counter rotating Atoms might pop up, to resist further compression allowing for more energy density. When atoms start falling into each other we will enter the world of electron plasma where Protons and Neutrons will cease to exist because of missing required space. Next electron rotonal attractions might need to be compensated via positrons or other counter-rotative particles. This might further increase energy density.

At this level, the whole electron(/positron) plasma looses on gravitational attraction capability. So on the gravitational point of view, the black-hole as a whole will not further increase in mass. It will increase in inherently in-observable hidden energy (>3rd derivative) of course but not providing any further gravitational attraction (atom level roton span). All existing gravity in the outer rotational part will remain and contribute but not any further inside.

Now what does a black hole provide instead of atom span gravity?

• Electron level: It will remain providing attraction on the level of electron span, which is the electrical field component. So a black-hole is expected to provide a huge electrical field (verification: …).
• Sonon level. Moving electrons further together will leave the interior of the black-whole as a pure sea of Sonons (the electrons base-photons). So even photons will start to get attracted into the black whole.
• This will provide basis for the known “Schwarzschild” radius where no more photons can escape back outside.

So how do Sonons/Photons get attracted? Do we have Anti-Photons?
What does Sonons make different from a general Roton? A Sonon already travels at the speed of light, so it already has the maximal amount of energy it can carry at its given size. Does rotonal attraction into travel direction exist at all? Does it exist backwards? Well not as such, as we defined it as a stable self-sustained system in the LEDO-Field which might NOT primarily induce waves. Or does it? Let’s assume for now it does. So light gets attracted into the black-hole too at least in co-axial or planar orientation. So we do not actually SEE Sonons/Photons leaving the black-hole. The LEDO field conveys the Sonon spanned energy density oscillation.

Faster than light information transmission

We need an entangled system which allows to take influence on the precession axis of both objects.

D-D- Deuterium Entanglements

Let’s take two deuterium cores (or a He Nucleus) and make sure, that both deuterium cores are entangled, so the two contained charges (electrons) share the same rotation axis. Ok this is tricky, as they will stick together. Let’s take another approach …

D-AD Deuterium-Anti-Deuterium Entanglements

A Deuterum-Core and a Anti-Deuterium-Core they might most likely keep their distances and lock into some fixed distance. Along the entanglement axis. Now we need to increase distance … hmm this might be tricky, as changing the locking resonance-point might move tild one axis slightly away which might lead to a loss of the entangement.

He-He A He-He Core Entanglement

A He Nucleus consist of a row of two NeP Triples (Tritons). If we succeed to separate this entangled system again without interference of other electrons we might be able to transmitt information by applying a small notch (precession) to one of the Tritons. This precession will (presumable) instantaneously lead to a precession of the entangled Triton. Can this precession be somehow measured? Both should theoretically be possible.

We might remain at the problem of a measurement destroying the entanglement. The confinement of the electron in the two Nuclei definitely helps with this, so we might try to add two more probe entanglements with which we might try to influence and read-out the state. Always waiting for the disturbed system to re-entangle again. If this ever happens.

Figure

^Footer.