Black holes

Why does gravity escape a black hole? Generally it does not, but.

This would be the classical view: Because this is a static property of space-time. It is called energy-density. So fields can not be faster than light, but gravity can? Yes, this is how Einstein calculated as well.

Result: The black holes classical mass exactly corresponds to the amount of matter/energy it attracts. So it is a mirror to mass, or a stale end for any open (residual) resonance channels.

End this is where RQM pops in nicely. The RQM explains, why a black hole has always exactly the identical mass to the mass it attracts.

WHAT IT REALLY IS: A place, that does not allow to be moved or turned by outside. So it “prevents” all resonance channels. What does that mean, it means something else than you think. This is not like “nothing” in resonance view. Any free resonance-channel is not left free, it is captured. This means any matter can not freely adjust its phase. It automatically gets attracted. Linearly (in respect to its original natural trajectory) and orthogonal in respect to the black-holes virtual “attraction”. This creates this spiraling movement.

THE ALPHA-PARTICLE acts as a black-hole for electrons and positrons. Or in other words it is a mirror, and reflects all incoming resonance-potentials which are smaller than the alpha-compound.

Prediction: An Alpha-Core could also host two Positrons. The “void” in the middle of the Alpha-Core can also provide a common center for an electron-Pair.

Why can an alpha only host ONE pair? And why does this help an Electron-Pair to remain stable?

Second, it keeps the electron-pair in place, otherwise it will escape in axial direction (not having much directional inertia - another interesting topic). Then it mirrors the resonance-channels as the resonances can not “pass” the object. It only mirrors channels though which are exactly aligned (entangled).

Good now for the tricky first point. Why can an Alpha only provide a mirror for two electrons? Once two entangled electrons are captured, the Alpha is additionally locked in place by the Electron-Pair. Why should this prevent another Electron-Pair to find a resonance-channel mirror too?

Being a mirror might also need adjusting to the resonance (no the opposite holds). So we start with a single electron first. This might be tricky now. But maybe it can find an ortogonal orbit? But not on its own. It would need a core to adjust to its trajectory - which it does not as soon as another pair has captured it. But theoretically two Electron-Pairs could rotate around a Alpha. BUT only if their center match exactly. This would need a p-shell like quad resonance. This is common in atoms. So why can a single Alpha not host this?

–> The two Electron-Pairs “Center” would react repulsively from their center, so the second pair avoids the first. Ok, that could explain the entangled state behavior.

Open resonance channels would though also need to reflect the ability for 2 electron capturing without a present entanglement.

Standard physics: Does a single electron care, whether a core has a single or double electrical charge? Question: Is an electron attracted stronger by an alpha than a proton? A proton provides a single “restricted” open resonance channel. An alpha fully consumes this channel (mirrors). So this would result in “full” (mirrored) attraction. So any electron would “feel” the alpha as a double charge if the channel remains free.

–> This would make sense.

A He+ (Alpha, 1 orbital electron) would show up with a charge of +1 to the outside caused by the electron. And it’s still available “side-ways” (???) resonance channel. A second electron, would it still see the A++ charge? Right behind the alpha in exact opposite direction it would. In all other directions it would still see the other electron.

Prediction: There is a He-Alpha core, which is able to capture two Electron pairs. This allows a He– Ion to be stable for some time until the electron paths come into its way. And a … ? … flies away.

BUT:

• (1) A Positron He-Atom would need to exist too. With the exact identical Alpha-Core that is (showing up as negative charge to the positron). So there is no Anti-Alpha needed. CHECK !!!!
• The same would NOT hold for a Proton, which provides exactly one electron resonance channel. YES
• (2) A 4 Electron He-Compound should be able to exist for a short but would immediately (time?) separate. CHECK
• (3) Why is a Neutron not doing the same to a single electron? Reacting as a mirror? Maybe because it has a dipole moment.
• (3a) A isolated neutron has a dipole moment and a rotation axis. Reflexion only happens exactly in rotational direction
• (3b) A neutron in a nucleus compound locks into the icosahedral inter-nucleon core-resonance. It is not symmetrically closed and does not “shield” resonances.

So there are “objects” which can “shield” gravitational resonance potentials - BUT they act as mirrors reflecting them. (end of universe a mirror or a vacuum cleaner ;-)

Prediction: An electron might be able to be captured by a Neutron in an exact Equatorial plane. The Neutron poles though, will then also start to provide symmetrical resonance channels. The resulting “Tilt” of the poles will lead to a repulsive effect disturbing the mirror-effect so this might decay (into a Proton two electrons and a myon). A separation of the resonances into different spatial directions.

Gravity is only a bias of uncancelled Nucleus resonances escaping between otherwise closed or partially closed Quark Anti-Quark resonances.