First element with attribute size

Protons and Neutrons are the smallest and first entities, which can truly be assigned the property of “size”. At least spatial size as we perceive it in context of matter. Why does matter show extensions in 3 dimensions? Probably simply because electrons happen to combine 3 rotational components.

Prerequisites

Before reading this chapter, you should first familiarize yourself with these concepts:

• A proton is a small container for an electron. A proton/neutron compound (2 nuclei) is a combined bigger container for 1 electron. A Tritium-Core (3 nuclei) and an Alpha-Core (4 nuclei) are containers for 2 electrons.
• The combination of 2 electrons in an Alpha-Core is needed to provide an optimal quad-entanglement (e<->p-p<->e) rotation electton pair.
• An electron consists of 3 Rotons with 3 different rotation axes, but the share the same center. An electron has 3 resonance channels and it can build up to 3 entanglements.

Base Requirements

To create a stable resonance grid we consider this:

• The resonances have to be aligned on a symmetric grid such that they can build Rotons across the center of the different nuclei (Proton, Neutron, Deuteron, Alpha).
• Protons and Neutrons should provide a shell-halve as similar as possible. If we “assign” the contained electron to one of the shells (Baryons).

The difference between a Proton and a Neutron

Why do we need to talk about the difference between a Proton and a Neutron? And yes we can not do this without having had a deep look at what quons (or “quarks” if you like) are and what not.

As we know, Protons and Neutrons are only cages to hold an electron (e+ if you like).

There is no positive charge

As mentioned earlier on, there is no positive charge in a Proton. It is simply a negative charge held at a specific place.

A question long unanswered was: How does the trapped electron look like a positive charge to external electrons? a) Because the Proton holds the electron (e+) at a specific place (which might be sufficient in terms of magnetism). b) Or also because it holds the electron in a specific orientation? Like its (current main) rotational axis aligned with its structural orientation?

Long keeping with the interpretation (a), it now looks like (b) is matching better to the experimental results.

Even in a NP-Deuterium core experiments show, that the P and N end of a proton can be distinguished. But maybe only, because one is the north and the other to the south-pole in respect the proton/neutron orientation. Another questions was, whether the proton/neutron resonance-grid is kind of open at the top and bottom (no rotating electron ring). Or if they are closed and the electron is free to rotate in any way. The important part is, that the resonance shell must be transparent for sending the directed e+ resonance potential.

The Proton tragedy

What are the main difficulties in creating a rotonal representation of Baryons?

Charge

The very big Baryon has to “contain” something small which can entangle with an orbital electron. Either it holds an electron only by energy density, or it holds the electron via the 2nd and 3rd axis.

Inertia

Why shall an Alpha-particle have a mass/inertia an integer factor 4 times the mass of a proton/neutron? This is reasonable for a resonating proton in the core, but not for a single isolated H-Proton.

Quon Model

Let’s define a grid-node as quon. This quon-node makes distance locked entanglements (Reson) to other quons along the particle sphere. A quon itself is only a quon, when it further rotates/oscillates. This allows further anti-parallel entanglements to opposite quons. This pair can be regarded as a Pion. There can be multi-tier quons which have 3, 4, 5 … resonance channels.

What does this solve:

• A Quon has much more energy than any simple electron-composite structure.
• We can explain why the nuclei come in integer multiples of some value.
• We need separate structures for isolated and compound Protons/Electrons.

Comment: If we say “contains a Lepton” then we mean it provides resonance-channels for coupling with an orbital electron.

Proposed Nucleus structures:

• Isolated Proton: 6 Quon Di-Pyramid. 4-Tier Quons each with 4 orthogonal resonance channels. They build 3 Pions. Contains 1 Positron/Electron
• Isolated Neutron: 6 Quon Di-Pyramid. 4-Tier Quons each with 4 orthogonal resonance channels. They build 3 Pions. Contains 2 Positron/Electron, entangled.
• Compound Neutron: 6 Quon Double-Tetraheder. Allow bonding with 3 other nuclei (alphas). Contains 2 Leptons.
• Compound+Isolated Deuteron: 12 Quon Ikosahedron. 5-Tier Quons with 5 resonance channels. Contains 1 Electron/Positron.
• Alpha Particle: 24 Quon, 24-cell 4D topology. 8-Tier Quons. Contains 2 Electron/Positron, free not entangled.

Result:

• Inertia goes with the number of Quons and not the number of resonance-channels. This makes sense as the Quon-Self-Rotation AND the resulting Pion-Entanglement provides the most energy.

Open Questions

No empty Baryon Why does no “empty” Baryon exist (Proton, Neutron, Deuteron, Tritium, Alpha-Particle)? There is always one or two contained Leptons. Possible answer:

• A central energy (density) is needed to keep the topology from instability and implosion.
• Or a central Lepton can provide further resonance channels.

Leptons in Alpha

Why do the two leptons (electrons) in an Alpha-Particle not entangle?

The two Leptons in the Neutron are not “free” in rotation. They are bound to the longitudinal placement within a defined axis. In this way, no electron can rotate around this compound. The two Leptons need to close a short range entanglement.

Within the alpha though, the two electrons find a free high-symmetric rotational environment. It is supposed, that entangling with orbital electrons is energetically more optimal.

Prediction/Proposal

Alpha as 4D Structure

The alpha particle not only virtually builds a 24-cell resonance structure. It effectively builds a locally confined 4 dimensional structure.

This will finally give it the full symmetry it is hailed for in standard physics. Two points in the middle can be placed in any direction with no preference. So they can freely rotate. Any available electron outside the core is accessible.

Alpha-Morphosis - neutral alpha particle

This name is given to the process, where the two leptons in the alpha particle entangle with each other instead of with orbital electrons.

This process is energetically sub-optimal. But in the long-term absence of electrons, the two lepton access are expected to occasionally align. This will result in an electrically neutral (charge 0) alpha particle. But it might need some energy (Neutrino) to build the entanglement. And it might be unstable whenever a free electron approaches.

Experiments:

• An alpha-particle captures electrons within microseconds to milliseconds.

Quons / Quarks

A revelation comes when we completely start to move the concept of quarks away and simply try to answer, what cage would be most suitable? And then interpret the experimental results from a new perspective.

Real Experiments basically show:

• When scattering electron onto protons: (a) some electrons scatter as if they hit a 2/3 charge. (b) some electrons scatter as if they hit a 1/3 charge.
• QCD colors refer to the quarks strong interaction charge. A charge that couples quarks to gluons (the strong force). Rotonal: This force couples opposite quarks together. And in every P and N all 3 colors R,G,B are present.
• The term “Isospin” seems to be the quantum state of this difference and the Isospin can even change its orientation. So N can swap roles with P. BUT: very important they say, this has nothing to to with geometrical orientation. Not? Strange.

But hey, this is a nice match for the Olavian model. Why? Because the exact geometric-structure varies depending on the environment. What remains is the overall topology.

Grid structure

OLD VERSION: One other suitable cage might be a resonance grid of 2-4 bands of 5 circles with resonating electrons. Why? Why where quarks invented? Because some measurements showed, that some parts of an nucleus feel like a 2/3 charge and some like a 1/3 charge. We do not actually know what part and how much of the nucleus.

Now how many rotating photons did we say build up an electron? We said 3, one fore each spatial direction. (btw. what was the trigger for 3 in the first place? Do we maybe experience 3 dimensions BECAUSE the electron chose to have 3?) So cause or effect, we’ll newer know.

Electron alignment

The 3 rotatory planes of the electron allow for 3 differently oriented entanglement. This property is exactly used for building up stable grids on spheres to withhold internal and external pressures.

Neutron