What physics often describes as “Particles” does not only referre to what we typically see as something with effective mass. Particles are energy packages and intermediate partitions of these. Particles can carry different modes of oszillations and resonances differently in all 3 spatial directions. Particles with 1 axis are Photons. With just a little more wobbling in second direction we come to the Neutrinos. Particles with 3 resonance axes are Leptons (e.g. electron) and the different frequency mixtures.
The whole zoo of standard physics particles are different form of exitations of temporarily or stablel self-resononances of photons and electrons. The might oszillate in one, two or three dimensions und build complext self-resursive loops in space.
The might come with different sizes and frequencies and other categorizable attributes.
I did not want to go into the details of all this particle-zoo listed in standard-physics trying to understand what all these Lepton, Bosone, Myons, Baryons and Pions should be. Unfortunately if you want to understand what is written about the experimental results (e.g. at CERN) you have to get known to these Terms.
INFO: If you want to learn about the Particle-Zoo please read some introductory articles OR: Read on, you’ll love the simplicity.
While building this up, we got 2 rules:
If someone tells you “It is not allowed to remove a Quark from a Proton according QCD” then just remember: when i happen to find it in isolated state somewhere, I will have to give it another name.
So finally i got a little tired of all these possible creation and delay processes triggered by massive amount of energy. At the end you never know which energy was taken from where and what appeared as side-products “at random”. TODO: Check all decay paths if they match with the interpretations and improve view.
For you to understand what is going on in this chapter, you need to understand some of the basic rules this model is built on.
a) Particles can only interact with each other over longer distances if they have the same “Rotonal-Span” or share some resonance potentials. b) A resonance-loop can have different frequencies for all 3 spatial directions. c) If different frequencies combine to one “particle” they must have the same center for all frequencies and Sub-Rotons. This allows them to stay at the same place, such that they do not escape their own energy density pressure (from their center).
By the way: Energy density pressure might just be an “empty space” where all external fluctuations and waves are shirmed of from (internally neutral). Having the effect, that everything gets attracted to the outside and the Proton experiences some internal pressure. I you happen to “shoot” an electron at a nucleus, it might be very likely that it falls apart.
I had about 2 days to read a little into the topics of this zoo and looked at a few decay processes to build a picture on how this must look like in Rotonol-Model world. And again was quiet surprised how good this all came together. All those particles make absolutely sense and form a matching number of “Puzzle-Stones” to create an Atom.
Nevertheless, the Particle-Zoo just builds a bunch of energy-levels and 3D resonance-Modes that match with the quanta of the Rotons we can observe. By butting these puzzles together we might maybe find out how the substructures are built.
As described elsewhere we have different characteristics:
Overview (more or less standard physics):
| Group (Energy ↑) | Sub-names | Size (typical) | Energy / Mass Scale | Rotonal Span (Parent) | Rotonal Children | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photons (massless*) | γ | < 10⁻¹⁸ m (pointlike) | 0 eV (energy from frequency only) | Light-Roton | Sonon* (EM-wavelets) | Mediate EM force (*) |
| Neutrinos | νₑ, ν_μ, ν_τ | < 10⁻¹⁹ m | ~0.01–0.1 eV | Neutrino-Roton | Flavor oscillation modes | Extremely weak interaction |
| Leptons: | Electrons, Myons, Taus | |||||
| Electrons (charged) | e⁻ | < 10⁻¹⁹ m | 0.511 MeV | Electron-Span | Spin, orbital modes | Extremely stable |
| Myon | μ⁻ | < 10⁻¹⁹ m | 105 MeV | Nuecleus-Span | Decays to e + ν | |
| Tau | τ⁻ | < 10⁻¹⁹ m | 1777 MeV | Atom-Span | Rarely produced | |
| Quarks: | ||||||
| Quarks (u,d,s) | u, d, (s) | ~10⁻¹⁸ m (effective) | 2–100 MeV | Quark-Span | Color-spin modes | Confined in hadrons |
| Quarks (c,b,t) | (c, b, t) | ~10⁻¹⁸ m (effective) | 1.2–173 GeV | (Heavy-QCD-Roton) | Heavy flavor modes | Very short-lived |
| Mesons, Pions | π⁰, π⁺, K⁺, η, ρ, … | ~0.6–0.8 fm | 135 MeV (π⁰) → few GeV | Meson-Roton, Nucleus span | Quark-antiquark modes | Strong-force composites |
| Atom structure: | ||||||
| Baryons | p, n, Δ, Λ, Σ, Ξ, Ω | ~0.84 fm | 938 MeV (p) → several GeV | Baryon-Roton (P, N) | 3-quark rotational states | Stable or resonant |
| Atomic Nuclei | H, D, He, C, … | 1–5 fm | Few MeV → GeV per nucleus | Nuclear-Roton | Shell modes | Collective effects |
| Compounds: | ||||||
| Atoms | H, He, Ne, … | ~0.1 nm | eV (electron shells) | Atomic-Roton | Electron orbital modes | Chemical behaviour |
| Molecules | H₂, HD, H₂O, … | ~0.1–1 nm | meV → eV (vib/rot modes) | Molecular | Dipole, rotational vibrational | Polar orientation possible |
| Condensed Matter | Solids, liquids | nm → μm | μeV → eV (phonons, magnons) | Macro | Phonons, collective excitations | Emergent behaviour |
| Macroscopic Systems | crystals, fluids | mm → m | classical energies | Macro | Continuum excitations | Classical limit |
Comments:
Boot-Strap:
Comment:
| Particle | Type | Mass | Created in | Dominant Decay | Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e⁻ | lepton | 0.511 MeV | β⁻ decay, EM | stable | EM, W |
| μ⁻ | lepton | 105 MeV | π⁻ decay | e⁻ + ν̄ₑ + ν_μ | EM, W |
| τ⁻ | lepton | 1.777 GeV | high-energy | leptons/hadrons + ν | EM, W |
| ν | lepton | <0.1 eV | β decay, π decay | stable | W |
| γ | boson | 0 | π⁰ decay, EM | stable | EM |
| W⁺/W⁻ | boson | 80 GeV | pp | leptons/q | W |
| Z⁰ | boson | 91 GeV | pp | leptons/q | W |
| H⁰ | boson | 125 GeV | pp | bb̄, ZZ*, WW* | EW |
| π⁰ | meson | 135 MeV | hadronic | 2γ | S, EM |
| π⁺ | meson | 139 MeV | pp | μ⁺ + ν | S, W |
| p | baryon | 938 MeV | QCD | stable | S, EM, W |
| n | baryon | 939 MeV | nuclei, pp | p + e⁻ + ν̄ₑ | S, W |
(1) Why do we observe matter and almost no antimatter if we believe there is a symmetry between the two in the universe? An antiparticle is typically nothing special. When we observe it, it just did not have the time yet, to rotate 180° into it’s normal position. If two Rotons attract each other via entanglement, then are in opposite orientation. And this is exactly when something “feels” to be an antiparticle. (Just as an idea). When they are disturbed, the statistically rather align back in the similar direction.
(2) What is this “dark matter” that we can’t see that has visible gravitational effects in the cosmos? These are Rotons the size of solar-systems, galaxies (and maybe galaxy clusters)
Why can’t the Standard Model predict a particle’s mass? (3) Hmm, well … (we need a method to derive sub-inertia and how to propagate it levels upward)
Are quarks and leptons actually fundamental, or made up of even more fundamental particles?
(4) As we have seen they are as “fundamental” as we defined them. Something that has an axis and a frequency does not seem to be that fundamental though. Maybe we once manage to rattle an electron so far, that we can find the sub-Roton rotonal inertia.
(5) Why are there exactly three generations of quarks and leptons? Because we have at least three layers of rotations in an atom at higher radii than electrons:
(6) How does gravity fit into all of this?
TODO
Please feel free to have a look at a few trials regarding sizes and dependencies of
**
Use the share button below if you liked it.
It makes me smile, when I see it.