The magic of matter

Why is matter local and does not want to travel at the speed of light?

Inertia

Inertia: is the resistance of a system to behave according to an external force (field).

Inertia on rotonal view: Basis is a nearby coupled Rotron with equally directed Rotons. If you start pulling on one of the Rotons, a “spring” wobbling motion will start between the two Rotons. As cars in a traffic jam. Once all cars drive with 120 km/h all is fine and they continue with that speed. But think of what happens as soon as someone starts to drag at the Front-Car (the Twon-Roton) and tries to turn it into another direction? The Twon-Roton might re-couple instantly into the new direction. Now the Twin-Roton tries to re-align with its Twon-Roton which starts a wobbling (precession) oscillation between the two. This continues until they reached a new common co-axial orientation - or remain in a certain stable angle (precession) in relation to the constant acceleration.

What does that mean for the “causing force”? The realignment absorbed parts of the entangling source field. So the original field looses on Wave-Intensity. This even applies if the acceleration is into the same direction of travel (Helicity=0). So it is still the traffic-jam effect.

So until the Di-Rotron has reestablished its ordinary rotonal distance there is some tension (as in a spring) which temporarily increases or decreases the rotonal distance. A force that temporarily resists on directional changes of flight. You pull on one side of the spring (increasing axial span), uupps there is some force holding it back until the spring has reestablished it’s natural distance.

Implications of Inertia interpretation

Considerations:

• If the force is too strong (on the magnitude of the Di-Rotons axial span), the entanglement within the Di-Roton might break up.
• Inertia depends on the “type/magnitude/frequency” of the distracting field.
• Inertia is in relation to the number of actively entangled systems on this magnitude (and subsystems ??? need to clarify in what extent).
• A constant atom level force (gravitational) only affects Rotons with atomar span.
• If the force is variable (bad example for gravitation) then it also affects the derivative Sub-Rotons. If the forces change-rate is also variable then we start to also “feel” the sub-roton resistance (inertia).

It makes a difference whether you try to accelerate a system gravitational (size of atom) or electrically (size of electron/proton). (TODO: Magnetic is when charges move giving some Lorentz-Force). An electron does not care that much if it’s atom is accelerated atomically - or does it (???). Does an atom care if its electron is accelerated? Well, at least these are different kind of forces. TBC

TBD: Think of it like this: You can not accelerate an H-Atom with an electrical field. You need a gravitational field for this. So winding up the “gravitational” spring during acceleration … the gravitational spring remains bent, but the electrons spring remains unbent. This holds for an electron as long as the acceleration is constant.

So atomar inertia depends on the acceleration. Electron inertia depends on the first derivative of the acceleration. And inter-atomar “temperature” (atom-wobbling) depends on the integral of the sub-spring tentions.

So when we look at the “force-change” as a “Dirac impulse” (infinitesimally small and therefore strong force, like driving your car into a wall) we have impact on all levels of derivatives (sub-system). At least theoretically if you manage to “create” such a dirac impulse. As driving an atom into another atom will start electrons being dragged around and their force-change will lead to a tention-change in the electrons Rotons, but that’s basically it.

Lets … do you know what I’m just thinking about? How can we measure the “Sub-systems” in our Rotonal Model? We need to apply “changing” forces on the respective levels.

Picking at Rotonal compounds

Consider a rotonal system with a higher and lower layer. A Helium Atom for instance where we look at a single electron.

Inventing MRI

Let’s try to apply a gravitational force on an atom, ok we know how to do that (constantly accelerate a car). Good. Now let’s go to the first derivative and try to create a changing gravitational force. Hmm, we can not actually create gravitational waves and apply them to a “stationary” system. We can try to constantly accelerate and decelerate the car/atom as a moving system. That would actually be, what a microwave is doing to an atom or molecule. Creating a constant oscillation to the atom. This will apply some 1st derivative constant force to the electronal roton-span. With this we might start to ‘feel’ the springs of the electrons. So in addition to the pure atomar inertia, we might start to ‘feel’ the pure lepton inertia.

Let’s try to go further down. We take a H-Atom or He atom and apply an electric force. Now the rotating electron will feel some force into one direction (let’s say orthogonal to its rotation). Now the electron will now start to change it’s location but if the force and own rotation continues we will observe a precession on the electrons orbital. The circular spinner now starts to tilt as long as the constant force is applied. Next step. Let’s create a changing electrical field (kind of a electro-magnetic field??). If the electrical field changes (need to define useful frequencies) then the precession will also change and we will start to ‘feel’ the “inertia” of the electron. So to enter the investigation of the electron sub-components (feel the energy/inertia of the sonons) we’d need to create a constantly changing electro-magnetic field.

This is basically what an MRI does, it tries to change the (changing??) magnetic field by rotating it around a further spatial axis.

Open questions:

• Could we look deeper into matter, by rotating the rotating system around a second axis?
• How can we measure such a resistance/inertia increase?
• How fast rotations would we need, at which diameter?

Further:

• Imagine we build a series of rotating outer system to view further into electrons. Would we still be able to get information out of it? And feed energy into it? What rotations speeds would we need?

Experiment: Try to measure the speed of the electron via the precession angle and the applied force.

Internal Note: Don’t forget the create an Anti-Deuterium. (Gravitational neutral? I mean after the general Energy-Density repulsion.)

Assessment

Hypthesis: …

Observation

Verification:

….

Figure

^{TO BE CONTINUED}