Is the term energy at all important in the LEDO-Model? How did it matter (hehe) so far? How do we see it now?
We introduced the term “energy density” for different purposes.
As every entity has its “size” there is no mathematical singularities. Every Rotonal-Compound can still be modeled as a point-like source of inertia (which we still do) but only outside of the radius of the Rotonal span. Inside this span the repulsion changes to an attraction either aligning the entities into a bigger amplitude (e.g. photons) or a destabilization of both involved Rotonal-Compounds - the Compound breaks up into it’s sub-Rotons.
Why is it more optimal for a system to reach a high “energy density”. Improving for density is somewhat similar to a reduction of the size of the compound. This reduces inertia and allows the system to react faster. Falling into this state of higher energy-density the compound can give energy away to the higher level systems.
Rotations induce oscillation potentials into the “ADR” (Achronous directed resonance) field. Changes in speed (by acceleration) and therefore direction (precession) though induce waves into the LEDO-Field. These are caused by the fact, that the Self-Resonance entities in the LEDO-field do not fully cancel themselves anymore. Some artifacts remain out the outer part of the Solitons wave-peak. The span of the emitted wave-lengths will be of the magnitude of the sub-roton sizes. So this might most likely emit single Solitons (Photons) along the tangential direction. This effect is typically called “Bremsstrahlung” in standard physics. A question remains, if there might be some magnitude of the acceleration which will lead to such precessive waves on different layers of the Roton. In such a case, we might consider the possibility that new Roton-Compounds might be created.
Furthermore we will have unpaired waves in the LEDO-field that will simply be sent out as directed or radial wave and not remain as a self-sustained Roton.
Think of the repulsion as the sum of all such waves (in some span, to be defined in rotonal and inertial character). So these waves will lead to a little gitter within the span for a relevant Roton.
In this view, a Rotonal compound is anchored to all it’s sub-resonance frequencies (ADR and LEDO).
The more sub-resonance anchors the more inertia they have to drag.
The sub-Rotons (spinner) react on these waves by tilting into their (spin-direction-relevant) orthogonal directions. Summing these up over all substructure tilting will result in an overall axial repulsion. Unpaired compounds will change their direction of flight in a more tangential rotational direction.
Event though the “smeared out” attraction of different clusters might point into a direction line, the energy density repulsion will automatically stabilize the system. This stabilizes into orbital behavior rather than a directed attraction leading into a singularity.
So e.g. galaxy disc compounds are rather drown into this rotation by the tangential energy density precession rather than “i have happened to finally find an orbital where i by chance happen to escape singularities.”
Why does a Rotonal Compound react “slowly” on acceleration?
Acceleration requires a Rotonally entangled System to pass on its precession changes to their subsystems. A layered entanglement cluster acts as an individual whole. Its energy reacts as a whole from the outermost entanglement. All the “own” sub-components cancel each other out in the quiet state (no acceleration). During acceleration the compound still acts as a whole, but regarding inertia the subsystems give their parts to the overall inertia.
How can I find out how “heavy” a rotonal-compound is? Well as long as you do not apply acceleration you simply don’t know. So you have to accelerate it so it can reveal its content. Trying to find out its substructure, you might need to apply changes to the changes of acceleration, step by step if possible to “feel” how it reacts onto different forms, spans and a list of derivatives of changes of accelerations.
It is expected, that a rotonally fully entangled compound might not reveal its full energetic potential. Especially because such a compound can encapsulate un-entangled sub-parts which are not rotationally bound but only via energy density repulsion. As an example we have the electron (e+) within a proton which is not bound via entanglement. So this sub-part will have a very late response to spatial inertia of the whole Proton.
This also holds for a encapsulated electron between other Nucleus structures with a atom core. An atom is a compound of different entanglement which do not react as a rotonal-compound only. They react via an additional “gravitational” (energy density pressure) bonding. So all paired orbital electrons with their partners will react separately to the Nucleus compound.
The nucleus compound contains Nuclei which use bonds at the span of their sub-quarks (quark-rings). These are entanglements which are not only effective within the same Nucleus. Instead they can also create entanglements between the neighboring Nuclei via quark-to-quark entanglements (quark=quark-ring in this case). We’ll call these Entanglement-potentials. Such potentials might either be used (within a nucleus to hold it together) or as free potentials so to say which are not yet bound internally. So the constantly switching of up/down quarks in a Nucleus, might indicate, that some parts lead to internal bonds and others remain free potentials available for inter-nucleus bonding. The QCD-switching of quark-types is observed in compact cores like: H, D, T, A. Starting from Lithium (Li-5) these quark-entanglement potentials most likely behave differently and become effective.
The free potentials (u-quarks) were so far only contributing to the weak nuclear force (via the gluon-vertices). In bigger atoms, these potentials can be used but provide partners for entanglements between the nucleons. The down-quarks already bind as paired entanglement to the opposite side of a proton/neutron. Side-mark: electrons can entangle to the opposite side of a Proton/Neutron and down-quarks are entangled to the opposite side of the proton/neutron. The up-quarks are equally aligned keeping distance, the down-quarks are aligned in anti-parallel entanglement. So the up-quarks will form “down-quarks” to other nuclei.
Prediction on isotopes (TODO: Move elsewhere) :The bonding “energy/potential” available with some Atom-Isotopes is expected to be different. It should be smaller if N-Caps is present in the atom-core. This already binds the entanglement potentials.
Prediction on nuclei alignment (TODO: move elsewhere) :The optimal resonance situation will be most likely given, if the Nuclei align within the same distance as the diameter of the a nucleus. OR in the same distance as the diameter of a quark-ring (electron-electron distance resonance).
Prediction on quarks (TODO: move elsewhere) Starting from L-5 the quarks will be responsible for the inter-nucleus entanglements. They will “loose” their “naming” based on “weak/strong” force or up/down naming. TODO: Please design an experiment where we can show, that quarks in bigger nuclei behave differently regarding their QCD character.
In Rotonal model an e+ is seen as identical to a e- but turned into the opposite direction relative to another entangled/relevant e-.
If you shed a glass of wine and a glass of bear closely enough together, they will most likely annihilate, because afterwards there will be no bear anymore and no wine either. So they changed into something new a useless and unstable decay product.
If we speak of electron “Annihilation” as a process where electrons “change into something else” rather than magically “disappear” then we are mostly in sync. Standard physics though sees the most common types of annihilation as an event where waves cancel each other out. This though raises the questions, why there should be energy left after a annihilation?
So what we are looking at is a process, where a previously distinguishable e- and e+ “combine” into something else. Base on the roton model, if you bring two electrons close together they will detract each other and arrange into a rotational movement. As these electrons are already entangled, they will combine into some other Roton with initially arbitrary size. Rotational constructs, that can be observed, because the individual electrons will produce interactions in the detector systems. During this interaction, the compound rotonal object will loos entanglement and free some entanglement energy. This energy will end up in some acceleration of the electrons as they can not bind more internal energy (sub-Photons). The rotational energy of the compound will mostly likely be exposed to both electrons (in different ratios) when their entanglement breaks up caused by external forces.
This allows all such “particles” to remain observable, as they still consist of electrons. Observable at least if the environment allows enough interaction with the high-speed electron compound.
Why do we most likely not see all sorts of wavelengths/energy-quanta of such new particles? Caused by the surrounding matter and global resonances in the ADR-Field electron-compounds will find an energetically better placement in the corresponding oscillatory frequencies. During the process of trying to lock into this new resonances the electron-compound receives sub-accelerations which will lead to photons (“Bremsstrahlung”) to be sent out, until the system lost enough energy to lock into a stable sub-resonance and not overshoot the resonance-crest.
So when shooting two protons onto each other (routine existing experiments) the Rotonal Model would expect all sorts of sub-Rotons to be created within the resonance span of: multiples of Quark-Ring wavelengths (diameters) up to Nuclei and atom-radius wavelengths. So this indicates at least these as by-products: Electron-Neutrinos (quark-ring size?), Myon Neutrinos (Nuclues size?) and Tao Neutrinos (Atom-size). But we will also see multiple compounds of maybe 1 Quark-Ring with a double-quark ring (a partial of the quarks resonances).
During e.g. proton-proton collision or scattering experiments we often see other quarks the do not usually exist with nuclei. If we look at the Neutron as a grid of resonating patterns, then you well not only see resonances at the span of 1-Quark-Ring size (1a) but also at bigger circles around the Alpha-Particle. E.g. with 2q-rings or 3q-rings they also build rotonal compounds around a Alpha-particle. So if the Proton/Neutron happens to be scattered, a pair of 2q or even 3q rings will fly away. They might remain entangled for a while and then either decay into electrons or resize themselves to match the new stable rotation inertia.
TODO: Quark-energy compare the measured Neutrino with expected radii of the excited quark-rings within a proton.
Use the share button below if you liked it.
It makes me smile, when I see it.