preliminary sketch

Spoiler:

What is a Proton? It is half of a container that encapsulates an Anti-Electron. You are invited to follow the whole way of how this insight was established.

Deuterium-Atom Compound (H-Atom with additional Neutron):

Fore the structute of the nucleons please refere to this part: LINK

Convention: In this text we will label the “core-electron” or “alpha-electron” as a positron (an elementary core charge)

Atom core

The zoo of electrons, protons, neutrons, … and what are all those spins and forces?

See the proton as this: The absense of an electron. Or in other words a hole that draws all rotonal waves the size of electrons into it. Shielding what actually is inside.

Considerations

Core forces

Why does the atom core hold together, especially the protons and neutrons and other similar core compounds (e.g. alpha-particles)?

• The high energy dencity within the core generally pushes the nuclei away from each other
• The center or content of the necluens is more or less energy-empty.
• This means as soon as the come closer together (than their own size?) the energy-density repulsion weakens
• In this range, the rotonal resonances in the span of Qaurtons lead to natural attractions between the nuclei.
• These attractions are general in all directions, but also co-axially rotonal (Quarton Entanglement).

This implies:

• The core finds the best energy density distribution if the Necluons are packed geometrically stationary into an overall sphere.
• The core as it’s own has an own general “spin” to the outside. This spin will most likely correlate to an overal atom spin together with the elctrons.
• The orbital and alpha- electrons keep their entanglement independant of the core geometry, but there is some more stable states.

Prediction: The core-spin and the electron-spin will be in loosly in sync (same phase), as this builds the better bonding. But external influences might lead to a temporary phase-shift and rotonal tension, or even to a constant frequency-shift (phase-offset). So any core-spin not in sync with the shell-spin would lead to some slight “wobbling” on the oribtal-electrons.

• Experiment: How can this “wobbling” and resonating phase-shift between the avareged Electron-Shell and the core be measured? Is there a slight wobbling in the di-pole moment of the Atom? More precicely: This leads to a slight change in the direction of the entanglement = axial-rotation = electron-spin. So this effectively would result in a precession of the electron-spin which is centered to the core and might precess by an angel in the ammount of the core-size.
• A constant change in the electric field (entanglement direction) is called a magnetic field in standard physics. This leads to interaction between the spin of the core and the spin of the electron. In case of the Roton-Model, due to a change in entanglement direction.

Electron-Spin

Implications: The precession of the electron spins can give a corresponding indication of the size of the nucleus. verification: Physics view: The nucleus itself precesses in external field, and the electrons respond to this change (via angular momentum). This shifts energy levels (Hyperfine splitting?).

Hyperfine-Lines

As we have realized in the previous chapter, this electron-spin precession can effectively be measured. So what can we do with this information? The situation in a H, D, (and He-Atom) might be different. Here a change in core orientation has no effect on the core charge place or orientation. Here a Electron-spin (if present at all) will only give partial hints on the Necleus size. It starts to get interesting starting from the Li () atom.

Ok as the Hyperfine-Line at 21 cm is related to the H-Atom, we are obviously looking at a slightly different effekt here. In this case we look at the precession of a “single” Proton Core-Electrical charge. Which is not said to precess at all according to the Roton-Model.

Core Positron precession

An applied electrical field will tilt the positrons rotation axis. This results in a precession of the positrons-spin and of the electrons spin. A constantly changing electrical field is called a magnetic field. This magnetical field (change in precession of the orbital electron) can be measured.

Rotonal view: the electron span roton entanglement tries to keep the axes in parallel. This leads to a force into the direction of the “common” center. This ceases over time if no electrical field is applied. So an electrical field is something, that the electron allignes with? Usually this field is homogeneus.

Electron-Spin in an electrical field:

An electron tries to align its spin with any “entangled” or near-entangled electron. So in a homogenous location, we have electron-spin waves coming from all directions with no special preference. But if you manage to allign enough electrons into the same spin-direction, this will lead the target electron to align with spin of one or more of the field-electrons. This will induce forces to the target electron and lead to attraction (or detraction in case of missing electrons in one direction).

Charge

So “Charge” is simply the difference of alligned electrons in a given direction. We basically only have attractive forces for entangled particles. This means, that a repulsion only result because of a “missing” attraction in the other direction. So if you “shield” all parallel electron spin activiy from one direction (is this possible? Yes via a field.), then the remaining electrons on the other side will attract the target-electron.

Maximal absense of charge

Prediction: There is a limit of positive charge that can be reached. If one side has no electrons, the field can not be stronger then the remaining field on the other side. Where-as you can add as much electrons as you like on the side with the electrons. Hmm, does this make sense?

What have i just found: A Parallel spinned electron/proton

Electro-Magnetic-Field

In short: The integrated rotonal force an electron “feels” will lead to an alignment of the electron spin into the direction of the sink. This “precession” will influence the “gravitational” trajectory - an inertia imposed by other fields (e.g. atom rotation).

In short: If an electron-like partical is moving along a curved line, then the electron spin points into the direction of some TBD center, and the trajectory aligns to the precession imposed to the electron via it’s spin. So the spin-vector is basically the force-direction of an electron. If the electron travels undisturbed (along the electrical field lines) then the spin can have any arbitrary direction - which is very natural as it is in static travel (there is even no force into the direction of the proton). Only when the sum of all electron-induced rotonal attractive (electron tries to align with all other electrons) then the spin aligns and the trajectory changes.

It’s taken a long time until the electro-magnetic field has raised my attention. Why was it not important so far? It basically does not exist as such. It is a superposition of different individual fields and it was important the the Rotonal-Model did not relay on any such concepts. But now we are at a point, where we need to correlated predictions with evidence, and here we need to understand, what the standard physics term refer to and how to translate between them.

Our intention is to “understand” and not to calculate complex values. As everything resonates with nearly everything the main approach for predictions are via experiments or simulations.

Standard physics: We look at the field known as “Electro-Magentig-Field”. This field has a magnetic component to which an electron-spin tries to align with. Or rather, the spin feels torque from a magnetic field. The spin tries to align anti-parallel to the magnetic field. The spin does not align to the electric field. The electrical field interacts with charge (force, acceleration). (except spin-orbit interaction in atomic structure. TODO: Check this, but first try a own hypothesis.)

The EMF in LEDO-Terms is basicaly an avaraged direction of the sum of all electron-rotonal LEDO-waves, that currently arrive at this place. All “electron spanning” objects will try to align their spins to this spin field.

Rotonal view: Two electrons travaling on an aligned way, try to keep their distance (planar resonant distances). In some ranges this is stronger than the energy density pressure. Other electrons allign …