Creation of the Roton Model

Abstract

If you are reading this, you surely want to know, why the Roton-Quantum-Model was created. What triggered the author to start thinking about live the universe and everything?

And the base though was: “What happens with ‘something’ that is rotating around itself in a stable way? Something that exists only by its own rotation, via simple attraction to itself?”

Should not all be based on a simple scalable rule which explains the whole universe? Instead of saying there is no “GUT” (Grand Unified Theory), let’s just create one - independent of any standard physics obstacles preventing it. But wait, what has this to do with Schrödingers cat? Miau …

And here we go:

The cat is neither death nor alive until you open the box

What’s wrong with Schrödinger?

The author could not agree with the todays world view of the interpretation of quantum physic experiments. This especially holds for the phrase “A system state is not defined until you measure it. It lives in a superposition of all possible states until it needs to deside for one”.

So what sounds strange:

• A quantum state is not defined until it is measured
• If quantum state is measured, it collapses
• A quantum state is a superposition of different possible states
• Quantum spin is just a “computational formalism” and not a real rotation (who not? who knows that?)
• A spin is either up or down in a given spacial direction - which is much too simple and the direction choice arbitrary.
• The world starts to exist only when it is observed - so who is an observer? What is defines as being a ‘measurement’

How should it be

What sounds correct instead:

• A quantum state is not known (until you try to measure it). So the state is defined, but hidden.
• Measuring a state influences the state in some ways - mostly destroing the original state severely.
• A photon has a rotation axis in any spacial direction (spin). Passing a polarization filter with a given direction “influences the rotation axis of a photon” and forces it to turn into the given new plane.
• Photons are entangled because they share the same original object state (e.g. rotation axis).
• Photons are entangled because they are consistent in both time directions (past and future).

Entanglement

What are the consequences of this:

• Sharing the same object state means, that they have the exact same spin or in other words the exact identical orientation of the rotation axis.
• Turning a photon into a new rotational plane (polarization filter) will force it to move it’s rotation axis now either showing upward or downward relative to the new plane. It still has an arbitrary axis angel within the new plane.
• Measuring a photon spin with a polarization filter changes a big part of the photons properties. Only one of three spacial orientation information remains available.
• Entanglement means, that both photons share the same rotation axis so they behave identical regarding polarization measurements.
• Entanglement means, that both photons have an identical axis but arbitrary distance along this axis.
• Bi-temporality: If a photon can not keep (retain) it’s entangled state in(to) the future (e.g. because it is measured/destroid), it has not completely been entangled initially in the past. So the initial entanglement process was not successful.
• This shared rotation axis is maintained stable over some distance/time if it remains undisturbed by other influences.
• Both photons keep and align their axes orientation over nearly infinite distance, provided their spin (rotation axis) remains untouched.
• This entanglement can be viewed as a bi-directional inter-resonance of the two photons wavefunctions.

Further considerations (in retrospect of the Roton-Model defined later on):

A quantum state is possibly never known if there is no need for it to be exposed. A photon is later described as a “Roton” or rather a “Sonon” which is the basis of a self-sustained entity in the medium of spacetime. With this “Roton” character, two photons will keep their rotational axises aligned - once they share one. So some small interactions on one photon, might also influence the other photon. An Electron will later be defined as a combination of 3 Rotons. So the same can be said for entangled Electrons. Electrons have 3 internal rotation states and the combination of these are exposed to the outside as a spin. The internal state of an electron remains unknown unless it is entangled. Later we’ll go even further and define the relationship between an Electron and a Proton in an atom as an entanglement. The entanglement leads to the attraction (resonances), the rotational energy density leads to a general repulsion via the intensity of the medion waves. BUT this is a spoiler already, a spoiler you most likely can not grasp yet.

Footmarks

The term “spin” is not used in the Roton-Model. The reason is a slightly differennt meaning in current physics. A spin is missing the aspect of a real rotation and only gives a glimps of the real rotation within one spacial plane. A spin is either up or down relative to a given direction. So we are using the term “rotation axis” which is a vector and not a boolean of the function turnTheVectorIntoThisDirectionAndReturnTheSign(vector).

Visualization

The following visualization (animation) shows a “stacked” representation of rotons on multiple levels of rotonal entities. The rotating (entangled) pairs attract each other and keep themselves on the rotationally stable positions.

Click to play